A public source can explain what a provider documents. It cannot prove what happened in a reader’s account.
What sources do
We use official public provider documentation for product descriptions and relevant U.S. government sources for general concepts. Links appear near factual claims or in each article’s source notes. Source-check dates record our review, not the original publication date or a promise that a page will remain unchanged.
What analysis adds
Our question briefs, handoff models and review checklists are original ways to organize work. They are not official product instructions, legal standards, clinical guidance or a substitute for an employer’s approved process. An article that only introduces an original method says so instead of adding a source that does not substantiate it.
Examples and experience
Hypothetical examples illustrate a reasoning step, not a real customer’s outcome. We do not claim to have tested a private Zenefits or TriNet account, interviewed a fictional employee or reviewed an employer’s configuration. No employee documents, provider logos or sign-in interfaces are reproduced.
Names and dates need context
Older search terms and current product labels may appear together. We distinguish technology, services and a reader’s actual agreement rather than treating a familiar name as evidence of access or entitlement. Current naming context is gathered in the opening guide.
Corrections and limits
Use tomi@gmail.com to identify a factual issue and relevant public evidence. Do not send private records to prove a public correction. A changed source is not automatically proof of an earlier error or of a change in every account. See the editorial disclaimer for the boundary between this publication and individual advice.